When my father was drafted during World War II and dumped in Belgium just in time for the Battle of the Bulge, my mother and his first two kids (I wasn’t a glimmer in his eye yet) waited days for even a hint of news about the war… and waited months for letters from Pop himself. The news came in painfully slow trickles. First rumors, then snatches of broadcast bulletins on the radio, worldofkink then a newspaper story that may or not have been accurate…and in none of this was even a prayer for specific news from or about Pop. That kind of no-news existence is just hard to imagine now. Online, I can watch stories develop just by refreshing my Google homepage — really hot news is updated constantly, within minutes of dramatic fresh input. Heck, I can see minutes-old footage of events on YouTube, and read real-time blogs from every corner of the English-speaking world. The delivery, consumption, and digesting of news has done changed in radical ways. sport123s
We all knew the Web was gonna morph our reality into something new… but even a year or so ago, most prognosticators believed we had some inkling of what the brave new world might look like. Forget about it, now. All bets are off, all predictions inoperable. No one knows what’s in store. Least of all the news organizations we call mainstream media. The fate of newspapers is interesting to me… both because I grew up loving my daily dose of whatever local rag served the town I was living in… and because the culture of the news junkie was well-defined. (And I have been a news junkie since I was old enough to read.) vayajamones We knew what was going on in the world, and we read enough varied takes on events to form an independent opinion. It’s one thing to embrace the world and enjoy adventures… but it’s another thing to seek to also know the world while you plow through the decades. Like the guys selling horse-drawn buggies 100 years ago, refusing to realize the exploding market share the automobile was gobbling up… mainstream newspapers have been slow to give the Internet credibility for news dispersal. I think local papers will survive in some form (probably mostly online, though)… because communities need a central clearing house for local news. But it’s gonna be a painful transition. Because newspapers are owned by techno-phobes who regard online existence as some unknowable alien universe… and they just cannot, for the life of them, career101 figure out how to make it profitable. Please.
The shake-out will produce a good alternative to the daily tree-killing newspaper… but not until the old die-hard newsmen wander away, and news-dispensing organizations learn how to incorporate what entrepreneurs, marketers and copywriters already know about making money online. Right now, most newspapers see their online versions as newspapers without paper… but the old model of selling classifieds and department store inserts for profit don’t work online. The guy selling his 1998 Honda Accord is now on eBay and Craigslist, and the department stores that are surviving have gotten hip to email blasts and list building. Oops. However, no one knows exactly what the newspaper will look like in the very near future. This matters to marketers, very much. As the affiliate world grows ever more incestuous, elmbrookpsych and competition for pay-per-click gets nasty not to mention the gruesome, unpredictable and never-ending rule-changes by the Google Gods, the old ways of reaching prospects (by finding out where the eyeballs gather) will start to look attractive again. Soon, too.
I know of several top marketers who aren’t using PPC at all anymore. They use banner ads on sites that attract the kind of prospect they desire, as well as PR releases and the cultivation of go to guy status in online communities that thrive on — yes — breaking news. So it’s probably time for savvy entrepreneurs and marketers to start paying closer attention to where people-with-money are going for decent-length visits and multiple page-views. One of the strongest players in the NEW news game was also one of the first on the scene.
But Drudge is always the first stop. He doesn’t write anything for the site… except to rehash the headlines of certain stories he’s pitching. He has a staff that combs the world’s media centers for print and broadcast news, and offers up simple links to those sites. That’s it. He’s a bulletin board. And yet he has earned front-page stories in the Washington Post and New York Times, and been called the future of journalism. Why? Because, as simple as his site is, he gets something like 15million visits a day. While the Post sells 5 million tree-killing newspapers a day, and pretty much has no clue how many people really read its Website. So it’s more likely that mainstream media will begin to look more like Drudge, adfox than the other way around. Never visited the site? This is why I’m writing about it: I don’t care if you visit it, or if you like it or hate it. As a marketer and copywriter, you’ve got to pay attention to the way it’s morphing the Zeitgeist of our culture. Drudge covers newsy stories almost reluctantly. Like most of the talking-head cable TV shows, he really got a boost from the never-ending trials and tribulations of the current political fiascos. It’s the New York Times meets the Hollywood Reporter meets the National Enquirer. And you know what? It’s truly fascinating.